📱 Tech

I Tried Apple's Vision Pro 2 for a Week—Here's What Nobody's Talking About

I Tried Apple's Vision Pro 2 for a Week—Here's What Nobody's Talking About

When Apple announced the Vision Pro 2 at WWDC last month (June 8, 2026), I rolled my eyes pretty hard. The original Vision Pro, which launched in early 2024, was a technological marvel that nobody actually wanted to wear for more than 20 minutes. It cost $3,499, weighed about as much as a bag of flour, and made you look like a cyborg who lost a bet.

But here we are in July 2026, and the Vision Pro 2 is real. It's $2,999 (still expensive, but a $500 drop), it's 30% lighter (now 500 grams), and Apple fixed some of the biggest complaints. I've been wearing one for the past week—at home, at a coffee shop, even on a short flight. And I have some thoughts that go beyond the usual tech reviewer script.

The Good: It's Actually Wearable Now

The original Vision Pro gave me a headache after 15 minutes. The front-heavy design pressed into my cheeks and made my nose feel like it was being slowly crushed. The Vision Pro 2 is better. Apple moved the battery to the back of the headband (it's still external, but now it clips onto the strap), which balances the weight. I wore it for two hours straight while watching Dune 2, and my face didn't go numb. That's a win.

The new 'Light Seal 2.0' is softer and comes in more sizes. I have a narrow face, and I finally got a fit that doesn't let light leak in from the sides. The fan is quieter too—I can barely hear it unless the room is dead silent.

The displays are still stunning. Two micro-OLED panels, 4K per eye, 120Hz refresh rate. Watching a nature documentary feels like you're standing in a forest. The passthrough camera is improved—less grain, less latency. You can actually read your phone screen through the headset now, which was impossible on the original.

The Bad: It's Still a Solitary Experience

Here's what nobody's talking about: the Vision Pro 2 is amazing when you're alone, but it's isolating when you're with other people. I tried to use it while my wife was watching TV in the same room. I put on the headset, and suddenly she was just a floating avatar in my space. I could see her, but there was a barrier. She said it felt like I was in another world—which, technically, I was.

Apple added 'Shared Spaces' in visionOS 3.0, which lets multiple Vision Pro users interact in the same virtual environment. But who has two Vision Pros in the same house? The feature is useless for 99% of buyers. And if you try to show someone what you're seeing via the external display (now brighter and higher resolution), they just see a slightly distorted version of your view. It's not the same.

I think this is a fundamental problem with VR/AR headsets: they're inherently isolating. The Vision Pro 2 is better than any other headset I've tried (and I've tried the Meta Quest 3 and the Valve Deckard), but it still separates you from the people around you. Unless you live alone, this is going to be a friction point.

The Surprising: It's Actually Good for Work

I didn't expect to like using the Vision Pro 2 for productivity, but here we are. visionOS 3.0 lets you place up to six virtual monitors around you, and they're crisp enough to read small text. I wrote a 2,000-word article using just the headset and the virtual keyboard (which floats in front of you). It was surprisingly comfortable, though my arms got tired after an hour of reaching for virtual keys.

The new 'Mac Virtual Display 2.0' is seamless—just look at your MacBook, and the screen expands into a massive virtual workspace. I could have my email, Slack, and a browser all floating around me while I worked. It made me feel like Tony Stark, minus the suit and the personality.

But here's the catch: you need a Mac to get the full productivity experience. If you're a Windows user, you're stuck with the built-in apps, which are limited. No Microsoft Office integration beyond web versions. No Slack native app. Apple is betting on developers building visionOS apps, but in 2026, the selection is still thin.

The Ugly: The Price Still Hurts

At $2,999, the Vision Pro 2 is $500 cheaper than the original, but it's still more expensive than a MacBook Pro, an iPad Pro, and a high-end monitor combined. Is it worth it? For most people, no. You're paying for a luxury device that does amazing things but doesn't fit into your daily life yet.

Compare it to the Meta Quest 3, which costs $499 and does 80% of what the Vision Pro 2 does. The Quest 3 is heavier and has lower-resolution displays, but it has a huge library of games, decent passthrough, and a much larger user base. For the price of one Vision Pro 2, you could buy six Quest 3s and hand them out to your friends.

I get that Apple is aiming for a premium experience. And they've delivered. But the market for $3,000 headsets is tiny. Unless you're a developer, a rich enthusiast, or someone who really needs six virtual monitors, wait for the price to drop further.

The Elephant in the Room: Apple Intelligence

visionOS 3.0 includes Apple Intelligence features that use on-device AI to enhance the experience. There's a new 'Contextual Assistant' that can answer questions about what you're looking at. For example, I pointed at a plant in a virtual garden and asked, 'What kind of plant is this?' It told me it was a Monstera Deliciosa and gave me care tips. That's genuinely cool.

But the AI features are inconsistent. Sometimes they work perfectly; other times they misunderstand completely. I asked 'What's the weather like?' while looking at a calendar, and it told me about my appointments. The Siri integration is still clunky—Apple's voice assistant is years behind Google Assistant and even Alexa in terms of natural conversation.

Apple is clearly betting on AI as a differentiator. But in practice, it's not there yet. The Vision Pro 2 is a hardware masterpiece with software that still feels like version 1.5.

Should You Buy It?

If you have $3,000 burning a hole in your pocket and you're excited about the future of spatial computing, the Vision Pro 2 is the best way to experience that future today. It's lighter, more comfortable, and more capable than the original. The displays are incredible, the passthrough is almost good enough to forget you're wearing a headset, and the productivity features are genuinely useful.

But if you're looking for a device that fits into your life without friction, wait. Wait for the price to drop below $2,000. Wait for more apps to arrive. Wait for the social isolation problem to be solved (maybe with lighter glasses-style AR). The Vision Pro 2 is a glimpse of the future, but it's not the future itself.

I'm sending mine back after this week. It's not because it's bad—it's because I don't need it yet. And I suspect most people don't either.

TR
Christopher Lee

We spend hours researching and testing before we write anything. If something changes, we update the article. About our process →